![]() Valentina SQLite Server uses our standard protocol, multi-threading, multi-user techniques, etc established by years.ORM do thousands of such queries, especially on App start. My interest was to bench exactly: client-server-protocol on small commands, because this expose overhead of protocol.įew years ago, Xojo developer, which have port his own ORM from mySQL server to Valentina Server, have surprise us, that on such small “SELECT f1,f2 FROM T WHERE PK = x” queries VServer was few times faster of mySQL. This was the first attempt to bench and I think anyway this is the simplest scenario. But still can be interesting and important to check this of course. ![]() Although in such bench a lots of time will use SQLite engine itself, reading them from disk. For example, SELECT which finds 50-100K records and send them by protocol. Yes of course in ideal, we need yet add many other benches. Simultaneous workloads are much more interesting Same work load with 1, 2, n clients (its a server so one user is kind of low load)Ĭomplex loads (many inserters many readers etc)īenchmarking one aspect like this doesn’t say much for a server TODO: may be we will add mySQL and postgreSQL using Xojo classes. TODO: to run this against servers on local network, using Wifi (the slower the better). So everybody can check this easy if install both servers. P.S.3 This project will be in the V4RB/Examples/Advanced folder, staring from the next our beta. PRO Edition adds Report Editor and Form Editor with JavaScripting and dozen features. P.S.2 Also I can add that both servers are installed with their default settings. Valentina Studio FREE native database manager for SQLite, MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQL Server and Valentina DB. Valentina Server and cubeSQL both use WAL mode of SQLite engine, and shared cache mode.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |